Browsing the archives for the relationships tag.


Successful skating pairs reveal what makes their on-ice relationship work

Uncategorized

BY NICHOLAS K. GERANIOS
ASSOCIATED PRESS

Boy meets girl. Boy picks up girl. Boy tries to not drop girl on her head.

This is the world of pairs figure skating and ice dancing, the beautiful sports where a woman and man skate in unison across the ice.

But how do these skaters meet? How do they stay together? And what is the secret to their success?

Pairs skating turns out to have a lot of parallels to relationships in real life. Not the least of which is the potential for conflict while in proximity to very sharp objects.

Some pairs meet by accident, some are matched up by coaches or friends. Some seek each other out on the Internet.

At the U.S. Figure Skating Championships in Spokane in January, all manner of pairs were on display. The most successful was Caydee Denney, 16, and Jeremy Barrett, 25, who won the U.S. pairs title and competed in the Vancouver Olympics, finishing 13th last week.

Denney and Barrett began skating together in Florida in 2006, but Denney and her family moved to Colorado. They moved back to Florida in 2008, and Denney and Barrett picked up again.

Like a lot of successful partnerships, they are careful about what they say. Barrett blamed himself for some “poor throws” during nationals, and praised his partner for landing them anyway.

Finishing second at nationals were Amanda Evora and Mark Ladwig, who went on to finish 10th in Vancouver. In the tangled world of pairs, Barrett has dated Evora for years. The two teams skate at the same rink and have the same coaching team, making them training partners yet rivals at the same time.

Pairs skating is a complicated effort. Partners have to have absolute faith in each other to pull off all the jumps, spins and landings, some with names like “the death spiral.” The male partner must be strong enough to hoist the female into the air and set her down without apparent effort. This puts pressure on the man to stay strong and the woman to stay thin.

Finding a partner can be difficult. Pairs hopefuls have been known to advertise in skating magazines, through e-mail, and on Web sites such as icepartnersearch.com.

Skater Ameena Sheikh used that site, which is endorsed by U.S. Figure Skating, to find partner Aaron VanCleave. The site currently lists 59 males and 235 females looking for partners, which illustrates another challenge in pairs skating: There are a lot more women than men.

Women are encouraged to look for potential partners among hockey players, roller skaters, dancers and gymnasts.

Often, one skater has to move to be closer to the other for practice purposes.

VanCleave, for instance, moved from British Columbia to the Detroit area after he and Sheikh decided to skate together. Spokane was their second competition, and while they only finished 14th, they are staying together.

“We are going long-term, all the way,” Sheikh said.

Ice dancer Tanith Belbin was born in Canada, but moved to the Detroit area in 1998 because she was not able to find a good dance partner. She was partnered with Ben Agosto by coach Igor Shpilband, and they have enjoyed a lot of success.

At the Turin Olympics in 2006, Belbin and Agosto won the silver medal in ice dancing, the highest Olympic result of any American team in the discipline, and the first American ice dancers to win an Olympic medal in 30 years. In 2008, they moved to Ashton, Pa., to train.

They finished second in ice dancing in Spokane, behind Meryl Davis and Charles White, and both teams were scheduled to compete in the Vancouver Olympics.

Agosto contends they have never had an argument in 11 years of skating together. Successful skating partners have to be able to work through mistakes without exploding on each other, at least in public.

Source: freep.com

No Comments

Calm down: It’s V-Day, not D-Day

Uncategorized

By Russell Salzman

It has been the bane of every man’s existence for the better part of recorded history, and has caused distress and heavy drinking for single people for nearly as long. It is the inevitable topic of a column devoted to sex and relationships, published in mid-February. Its name is Valentine’s Day, and you should all be very, very frightened.

Well, maybe not frightened, but at the very least vigilant and aware.

This is a holiday that is devoted to relationships and the love/like that is shared between two (or more, I’m not one to judge) individuals. At least that is its intention. What the holiday usually ends up doing is forcing men and women to spend ridiculous amounts of time and money on getting the perfect gift for their partners, and forcing all of us single people out there to reflect on the fact that we are, in fact, single. Whether by choice or by circumstance, no one likes to be reminded that they are alone on this holiday.

But my friends, please do not despair, for I have good news: if you find yourself grouped in with any of the aforementioned generalizations, you are viewing this holiday all wrong.

For those of you in a relationship or situation that warrants buying your partner a Valentine’s Day gift, think back to the golden rule for Christmas, birthdays and any other gift-giving occasion - it’s the thought that counts. Who cares if you spend that extra $40, $50, or even $100 on that giant bouquet of flowers that you put no time or effort into? Same goes with jewelry and pricey trinkets.

Romanticism draws from the creativity and effort that you are willing to use to put a smile on your partner’s face, and an extra-fast beat in their heart.

Cover her bed with hand-picked flowers, make your guy his favorite meal with his favorite brew or even just steal your partner away from a night of drinking Downtown so you can both cuddle on the couch and watch a bunch of your favorite movies; the best gifts are the ones that require more planning and thought than money. After all, anyone can swipe a credit card, but only your special someone can give you what your heart really desires.

And for you single people, please don’t think that I have forgotten about you. Although all your friends who are in relationships or are seeing someone will (hopefully) be spending the day/night with their partners, I guarantee you that there is still a significant number of single friends that you can surround yourself with so no one feels lonely when there is so much love in the air.

And believe me, love is in the air. Although you may enter the holiday single, that may not be how you leave it if you play your cards right. So go party or hang out with your friends, meet some new people and let the holiday work its magic. At the very least, you’ll have a fun night. At best, you’ll find yourself paying attention to a different section of this column next year - the part devoted to those in a relationship.

Use this coming week to plan an unforgettable Valentine’s Day for your special someone or to find yourself a new person to devote to your affection, and don’t let your relationship status hold you down.

Happy Valentine’s Day!

Source: Pipe Dream

1 Comment

Relationship Rx

Uncategorized

Experts weigh in on starting, ending and improving the relationships in your life

By Kathy Megan

Here are some tips for people with relationships on their mind — whether it’s ending, improving or starting one.

Is it over?

If you’re feeling fear, distrust, contempt or a lack of respect, major work is in order, says Donna Ferber, a psychotherapist in Farmington, Conn., who specializes in life transitions. She suggests therapy as soon as possible.

“The longer you wait to go the doctor, the harder the cure,” she says. “If you think something is wrong, chances are it is.”

Of course, if violence or abuse is present, a partner should get help as soon as possible.

Another take on this comes from Nancy Brockett, a licensed professional counselor in West Hartford, Conn.

“If every time you are thinking about the relationship, there is a dread that comes over you, that’s an indication that it’s probably not what you are really wanting,” Brockett says. “If there is a sense of life when you are thinking about your relationship, a spark, even a small spark, then you are wanting to check that out.”

When to tie (or untie) the knot

Peter Kane, a licensed clinical social worker in New Haven, Conn., advises: Consider your ability to listen and talk to each other.

Says Kane: “Does the relationship make you feel more productive and energetic in other places in your life as well? Does the relationship help you, not strain you?”

One of the biggest mistakes people make, Ferber says, is to think “if we get married, he’ll settle down” or “he won’t yell as much.”

If a relationship changes after marriage, it is usually for the worse.

Generally, she says, “what you see is what you get.”

What about you?

Take a close look at yourself and really decide whether you are being the person you want to be, Kane advises.

Ask yourself, “Would I want to be married to me?”

This may be difficult to approach honestly because so often people are convinced that it’s their partner who is making life so hard for them.

Recognizing your role in the situation is key to improving it.

Getting over a breakup

Realize it will take some time, Ferber advises. Take time to understand what you both did wrong.

“Give yourself time to be alone,” she says, and don’t let well-meaning friends and family push you into dating before you are ready.

If you’re recovering from divorce, Ferber says, realize that it’s an evolving process and that it’s not just the loss of your spouse, it’s the loss of an entire lifestyle. Make sure you eat well, get enough sleep, and avoid alcohol and drugs.

Try something new, but don’t make drastic changes. Try a new exercise class, for instance, but don’t suddenly quit your job and move across the country.

“You can’t run away from the problem,” says Ferber.

Meeting someone new

Tell all your friends you want to meet someone, Ferber says. Get involved in activities that you enjoy or support; this will lead to meeting like-minded people.

For instance, you may want to volunteer for a group that helps others, or work for a political campaign or try a new sport. Online dating is also an option.

Source: Chicago Tribune

No Comments

Mirror, Mirror on the wall who decides beauty after all?

"Safer in the City" by Jessica Walker

My fairy tale adventure though BeautifulPeople.com!

By Jessica Walker

I hope you all enjoyed the fairy tale beginning to this two part article.  I had a lot of fun writing it.  Although, I hope you read into the sarcasm that was dripping from each sentence.

And now for the million dollar question… “Mirror, Mirror on the wall is Jessica beautiful at all?”  You’ll have to read to the end to find out.

If you are wondering, yes I did in fact register with BeautifulPeople.com.  I can attest that this site definitely caters to “looks” as the profile information is minimal and your admission is based on the opposite sex rating your profile image over a 48 hour time frame.

On your profile they offer the following sections to complete about yourself that the other members can access:

Name: Appears next to your profile image

Profile Description: Text box to offer anything on yourself

Profile Information: Date of birth, country, home address, cell phone number and private homepage

Occupation: Education, job title and job description

Profile details: Car owner, smoker, hair color, eye color, Weight in lbs., Height in feet, body type (slim, average, athletic, muscular etc…)

Interested in: Check a box for love, fun and flirts, social networking, business networking, invitations to parties and events.

In order to get a favorable rating you need to really market yourself through the chat rooms, add friends to your profile and of course rate the other profiles.  The site to me is more of a social networking platform and less of a match making destination. There are no matching filters or tests for personality/compatibility.  This site also seems to cater to heterosexuals only since the members of the opposite sex determine who stays and who goes.

From a safety standpoint I am fine with this site.  You have the option to offer very minimal personal information, which I advise. I would refrain from completing the majority of the Profile Information as it gives away your birthday, home address and cell number.  They offer many ways to communicate with someone without having to give out your cell number or personal email address.  Beautiful People does not offer background checks but that’s what we are here for, right!

I personally do not have a problem with this site.  I believe they have every right to do what they are doing.  Relationships are initially based on looks and if that is their niche then they should strive to be the best at it.  Our niche is safety and we have dedicated our business to being the best at that.  Besides, you don’t have to join their site if you are offended.  There are plenty of other dating sites available, but if that is your preference then perfect there is a site that caters to you.

As a marketing professional, I LOVE options.  Options are empowering to me.  You could say I find beauty in choice.  It’s wonderful to be able to pick and choose whether I want to offer my support for a particular company.   Now it’s up to you to make the choice and that’s the BEAUTY I like to advocate.

Now to answer the million dollar question… I did not make the cut, even with a few favorable ratings.

So I turned to the mirror one last time, “Mirror, mirror on the wall, who decides beauty after all?”

The mirror replied, “Now you ask the right question my dear.  It’s not the cyberland men that’s clear.  You must not search for it far and wide, it is everywhere, right here and outside.  It’s blowing through the trees, and soaring up in the sky, it’s laughing out loud and even in a cry.  It’s seen through the eyes, felt with the hands and heard like a melody dancing across the lands.  My sweet child without further ado, there’s nothing more to review, the answer is plain and simple it’s YOU.”

Until next time, here’s to keeping you Safer in the City!

Jessica

5 Comments

Here’s to a New Year filled with Passion, Power and Purpose!

"Safer in the City" by Jessica Walker

By Jessica Walker

Happy New Year everyone!  I hope you all had a wonderful holiday season and have started off the New Year on the right track.  If you’re struggling to find goals to focus on this year then let me introduce you to a friend that can help.  Last Tuesday night I interviewed a fantastic expert through our Blog Talk Radio Show that could help you get back on track both personally and professionally.

I encourage you all to listen to our latest broadcast, just a click away at the top of the blog, to hear some extremely useful information discussed with Ken Donaldson a professional Life Coach and Relationship Expert.  Then be sure to pick up a copy of Ken’s book, “Marry Yourself First“, to help you develop healthy relationships, inspiring careers and an overall passionate life.

I’ve asked Ken to elaborate more on one of the concepts from his book that was discussed on our show.

Here is what Ken Donaldson has to say:

Avoid Relationship Issues with Conscious Deal Makers and Deal Breakers

What do you “have to have” in your relationships? Yes, those absolute, non-negotiable essentials you must have in order for a relationship to even have a possibility of working for you? What are they? The good news is that when you settle for nothing less than these essentials, you’ll find your core relational needs are met. The problem, however, is that too many times in our current culture, people have become used to settling for less.

This outcome, as I see it, goes back to the fact that most people don’t know what they really want in a relationship. Yes, they may have a vague or general idea, but they don’t take the time to really get both clear and specific. The flipside is that when you know what you definitely want, and aren’t willing to accept anything less, then you’re far more likely to find a relationship that will be both lasting and fulfilling.
What I’m referring to here are your deal-makers and deal-breakers. Let’s look more closely…

Your deal-makers are the non-negotiable essentials and components in your life - THE requirements you have to have. Think about what it is that you must have in all areas of your life (i.e.: relationships, friends, romances, work, finances and home). It’s worth the time and thought you put into establishing these criteria because you’ll then know the specific goals (targets) and parameters (gauges) to guide your life.
But let’s be specific and focus only on relationships for now. Let’s say that a healthy lifestyle is on your list of deal-maker behaviors for your life partnership.

So you meet someone who has the looks and charm of Brad Pitt, the intelligence of Albert Einstein, the spirituality of Gandhi, and the money of Bill Gates, but he drinks excessively and has no desire to do any physical exercise.

In spite of all these attractive qualities, if you’ve carefully considered and compiled your deal-maker list, you’d never get involved, because that one crucial deal-maker of yours is unmet. When you know what these essentials are, and you make sure they’re fulfilled, you’ll find yourself feeling more satisfied in your relationships (and in all areas of your life).

It’s important for you to accept nothing less than these deal-makers, because these are absolute and non-negotiable boundaries.

And then there are the deal-breakers. These are the dynamics, characteristics and components which are absolutely not acceptable. Just like the deal-makers, there is no negotiation. You absolutely, positively will not accept these into your life under any circumstances EVER!

Let’s assume smoking is a deal-breaker. You meet an otherwise awesome guy who smokes, thus creating an automatic deal-breaker. No conversation, no negotiation, no second thoughts. You stick to your absolutes because you know what you absolutely have to have and what you absolutely will not accept.

If you don’t have a clear concept of what you absolutely, positively have to have in your relationships and what you’ll never ever accept in your relationships, you’ll most likely unnecessarily and destructively settle for less than what you really want, need, desire and deserve to have.

Without understanding and practicing this one dynamic, your relationships are likely to be doomed and you’re likely to miss out on a happy and fulfilled True Life.

Take the time to reflect on this and then write down your deal-makers and deal-breakers. Share your list with people you’re closet to (your inner circle) and ask them to help hold you accountable. Stick to your list and you’ll be well on your way to an amazing relationship…and an amazing life!

Contact Ken
ken@kendonaldson.com
727.394.7325

Learn more about Ken
www.kendonaldson.com

Special Offer: Receive a 25% discount on all of Ken’s services by mentioning the Safer Dates Blog Talk Radio Show.

1 Comment

‘It was just a soul mate in every sense of the word’

Uncategorized

By Ellen McCarthy

The year she turned 30, Rebecca Bloch started dating a nice man. The type who did the right things and was ready to commit, talking of marriage after just a few months together.

The recent law school grad had spent the previous decade in a string of failed relationships. With every new guy she would adapt, tweaking some aspect of her personality to make it work. “And inevitably I’d go, ‘I can’t do this anymore,’ ” she says.

But this one was serious about her and “I thought, ‘Well, I guess that’s what settling down means — you settle,’ ” recalls Bloch, now 33.

Doctors blamed her tension headaches on the stress of studying for the bar exam. But when she was really honest with herself, she knew it was more than that. So in December 2006 she ended the relationship, then flew from Washington to Park City, Utah, to clear her mind doing the thing she loved best: skiing.

She decided she’d be like the women she’d met on chairlifts: happy and single. She would move to Denver, ski all the time and stop trying to fit her square peg into round holes. “I thought, ‘I’m not going to find anybody and that’s okay,’ ” she says. “I’m living for me.”

The headaches made a fast retreat, and Bloch, a Washington native and Sidwell Friends alumna, enrolled in a week-long ski school. She and a half-dozen other students, all in their 50s and 60s, were under the tutelage of Jorge Diaz Pardo, a Barcelona-born man who spent much of his 20s rotating between hemispheres, working as a ski instructor in New Zealand for half the year and Utah for the rest.

On the first day Diaz Pardo collected phone numbers for all his skiers in case anyone got separated. Bloch recalls thinking that Diaz Pardo “was this adorable Spanish ski instructor that I was going to have nothing to do with.”

Diaz Pardo chatted with his students about books and travel and their lives, and paid no special attention to Bloch. She found herself acting properly around the handsome European, until she became convinced he wasn’t interested. Then she relaxed into her more natural self, laughing loudly and telling dirty jokes.

Bloch had no idea that on their first meeting Diaz Pardo, now 31, had looked through her foggy ski goggles, caught a glimpse of her green eyes and thought, “I’m in trouble.”

On the fourth day he invited her to come swimming after ski school. She thought nothing of it until he grabbed her leg under the water and pulled her in for a kiss. “I remember being like, ‘What? ‘” says Bloch, now 33. “I was so shocked.”

She extended her trip five days. They toured a Mormon Temple, ate paella and skied. “We just talked about everything. And it was just so easy to be with him,” she says. “He’s so excited about everything. . . . He just seemed to love life.”

When it came time to return to Washington, Bloch was bereft. Diaz Pardo was also sad, but knew the drill about tourists: “You meet people every week, so you kind of detach,” he says. “You have a great time with people but then they go. And they go and they go . . . so you kind of create a defense mechanism.”

Still, they kept up through e-mail, Bloch always half-hoping Diaz Pardo would tell her to forget about studying for the bar and come back out to Utah. He cheered her on instead. In late February she packed her bags for Denver, took the Colorado bar and began her new life. When she and friends took a trip to Park City, roles were reversed. This time it was Diaz Pardo who wanted more. “It was like, ‘Here’s this great girl and I’m going to leave again,’ ” he recalls. ” ‘I’m going to go back to New Zealand and it’s going to be totally over.’ ”

He arranged to visit her in Denver and proposed a trip to Spain. Bloch hadn’t yet found a job so she agreed, their two long weekends together having rekindled her initial inklings that “this is somebody really special.” In Spain they hung out with his family, traveled to Morocco and talked about what they wanted this relationship to be. Anything serious might mean an end to his days as a wanderer.

“That was a huge existential debate for me,” Diaz Pardo says. For 20 days after Bloch left, he sat “staring at the wall,” wondering, “What am I going to do with my life?”

Finally he told his boss he wouldn’t be returning to New Zealand. It was time for stability, Diaz Pardo decided. Moreover, “I loved this girl.”

He moved to Denver, staying first for three months on a visitor visa, then in January 2008 enrolling in an MBA program as Bloch started her career as a public defender. And what began in both their minds as a fling morphed into something much more fixed. For the first time, Bloch found herself in a relationship that “was always just easy.” Both are adventure-seekers who see themselves as quasi-misfits and prefer to root for the underdog.

“It was just a soul mate in every sense of the word, and I never thought I’d be lucky enough to find my soul mate,” she says. “I thought that was just something people say.” In June, 2 1/2 years after they met, Diaz Pardo proposed in their Denver home.

There was a certain charm to the fact that Washington was hit with a record snowfall on the day of their wedding. (It was Bloch’s mom who “always said she thought it was far more important that I marry a skier than somebody Jewish.”) Guests sat by the windows of the Westin Grand’s courtyard Dec. 19, watching soft flakes glint on illuminated trees as they waited for Bloch to make her way down the aisle.

Once there she was serenaded by Diaz Pardo and her brother, doing an acoustic version of that Adam Sandler classic “I Wanna Grow Old With You.”

Source: Washington Post

No Comments

OnLove: Psychologist-author Robert Epstein says love isn’t accidental

News

By Ellen McCarthy

Robert Epstein believes that someday, in the not-too-distant future, many Americans will share his philosophy on relationships. And his philosophy is this: You can build love deliberately and choose whom to do it with.

All of this “falling” stuff, he thinks, will become passé.

Epstein is a psychologist and author whose previous research has focused largely on creativity and adolescence. He turned his attention to affairs of the heart after his first marriage ended in divorce. “It was personal,” he says. “I’ve certainly failed in relationships and in very much the typical American way, which makes it very frustrating — when you fail in a typical way.”

In 2002, when a young woman came in to interview for an internship and told him she’d never been in love, he had an idea: They set out to make her fall in love. The intern eventually backed out of the experiment, so Epstein decided to do it himself. After meeting a woman on a plane who agreed to be his partner in the endeavor, he began to employ strategies and behaviors that relationship experts have found increase feelings of intimacy: sharing vulnerabilities, touching each other affectionately and seeking adventures together.

The good news? They fell in love. The bad? It didn’t last. She was from Venezuela, and the logistics were too difficult to overcome.

Still, Epstein, former editor of Psychology Today, has been shaping his theory that love can be orchestrated ever since. It may sound strange to Western ears, he realizes. But Epstein’s come to think it’s the American way that’s really absurd when it comes to love: “We grow up on fairy tales and movies in which magical forces help people find their soul mates, with whom they effortlessly live happily ever after,” he wrote in a recent issue of Scientific American Mind. “The fairy tales leave us powerless, putting our love lives into the hands of the Fates.”

To gain insights into another way of cultivating love, Epstein has begun to study arranged marriages. Some studies have found that over time the affection between partners in arranged marriages can surpass that of couples who chose each other because of love.

Epstein, 56 and remarried, taught a course at the University of California at San Diego last spring in which students could earn extra credit by employing affection-building exercises with friends and strangers after class. Almost all the students who tried the techniques — including trust falls, synchronized breathing and prolonged gazing — reported greater feelings of closeness with their partners. (The psychologist has sworn off talking about his own relationship, but he will say his wife sat in on several classes that semester.)

The seed Epstein is hoping to plant in people’s minds, through lectures and a book he’s writing, is that we may have greater control than we think over this wily thing called love.

And if that doesn’t sound particularly romantic?

“All I can say is there’s nothing romantic about failure,” Epstein answers.

Source: Washington Post

No Comments

Help! My man’s a party-pooper: Can your relationship survive the party season?

Uncategorized

By Hazel Davis

You love a good knees-up - but HE hates socializing and just wants to stay in and read a book. Can your relationship survive the party season?

‘We’re having a Christmas bash at our house,’ says a new friend. ‘Lovely,’ I say, ‘I’ll be there.’ ‘It will be great to finally meet your other half,’ she says, and my heart sinks. Oh dear, it’s one of Those Parties. Parties where you have to take your partner. My brain works fast to engineer an excuse. ‘Well we couldn’t really stay long as there are no trains that late and one of us has to be there for the dogs,’ I say.

It’s a familiar pattern. I make a new pal, we get on like a house on fire, they ask us round to dinner and I start rolling out the pathetic excuses. And during party season it’s even worse.

Anti social partner: Does the idea of going to a party or out for dinner fill your other half with dread?

It’s not that I’m ashamed of my partner, far from it. He is kind, generous, funny and thoughtful. He makes lovely food, walks the dogs and cleans up after himself. To all intents and purposes he’s the ideal man. But when it comes to socializing, we couldn’t be more unsuitably matched.

The idea of going to a party or out to dinner in a group for him is about as enjoyable as eating a pair of shoes. In fact he’d probably agree to the latter so long as it was in his own house and he’d cooked them himself.

It’s the same even on special occasions. Earlier this year, a couple of days before my birthday, I had a dinner, just a small celebration in a Leeds restaurant with some friends and their other halves.

It was such a lovely evening, with presents, cards, cake and a rousing chorus of Happy Birthday. My partner? He was at home, reading a book. ‘Where’s Bob?’ my friends enquired. ‘Oh he was working too late to get the train in,’ I said, one of my usual standard lines. ‘Could he not meet us later for a drink?’ came the usual helpful response. Gulp.

Bob, meanwhile, is bewildered by everyone’s need to include him in such parties. ‘Just tell people I don’t like socializing,’ he says. It’s always been like this. When we met at university 13 years ago, I knew my guy was a loner. He was smiley and pleasant but he wasn’t what anyone would describe as a ‘people person’. If you saw him around campus he’d be the one in a hat, sitting under a tree reading a book.

Work parties are a no-no: ‘Every year he is invited, every year he declines. I have never met his colleagues’

During our courtship he told me about the best day of his life, when he was 17 years old, working in a hotel in Derbyshire and he woke up at 7am started reading a book and finished at 7pm without speaking to a soul all day.

Meanwhile, I adore meeting new people. I thrive on it. The prospect of a room full of new folk, all of them potential new friends, is positively thrilling. The idea of going out in a large group, sharing an activity with them or even going on holiday - I can think of nothing better. I make friends easily and I go to the opening of an envelope.

And so it continued into our relationship. When we graduated (he very nearly didn’t go to his own graduation and had to be persuaded) and he found his dream job working with a wholefoods co-operative, I moved 250 miles to the county he grew up in, expecting that I would make new friends. But he hadn’t kept in touch with anyone from school (’why would I do that?’) and he sure as hell didn’t want to socialize with anyone from his new workplace (’they’re my colleagues, not my friends’).

So I made my own entertainment. I joined a local choir and started a masters degree, gathering friends along the way. My new friends would occasionally pop over for coffee and then they’d drop the bombshell that perhaps we’d like to go to a party they were having that weekend.

And then the excuses would start. Bob and I would argue initially and I would stay home or we’d ‘compromise’. Which usually meant us not going at all. Eventually, at the end of my tether, I began going on my own, hooking up with single friends or taking along a platonic ‘date’ instead.

I developed a whole other sociable life away from him. So now, together we go to the cinema and to concerts and out for dinner and we have a lovely time at home. We play Scrabble and we read together. Essentially anything that doesn’t involve Other People. And without him, I go to parties, for meals, to festivals and weddings.

Socially mismatched: ‘The idea of going to a party or out to dinner in a group for him is about as enjoyable as eating a pair of shoes’

Ah, weddings. When we hit our late 20s, old friends inevitably started to get married. Cue an excruciating few years of awkwardness, leaving early and - on occasion - downright lies to avoid going. ‘I just don’t understand why they need me there,’ he’d say, ‘you go on your own if you care that much.’

On the few occasions I have managed to drag him along to a wedding (usually by use of emotional blackmail or the promise of not staying too long), the whole experience has been so traumatic that I return determined not to bother next time.

As a naturally sociable animal my instinct is to flit around talking to new people, but every time I look over he’s sitting looking dumbstruck or bored and I feel obliged to rescue him.

Or, worse, his awkwardness renders me unable to speak to people because I fear introducing him and him having nothing to say, so we stand in the corner talking to each other.

I recently came under some criticism from my family for not staying long enough at a large family party started at midday and continued into the small hours. We arrived late afternoon and left around 7pm. When we left the party I had nearly cried with pride that we’d made it at all.

When my relatives later complained we hadn’t stayed so long I wanted to jump up and down and scream about how they were blooming lucky we came at all, so much effort had I put into getting us there in the first place.

Bob’s defense is clear and logical and makes complete sense as he explains himself. ‘I don’t like talking in groups,’ he says. ‘You either end up listening to a loudmouth or it becomes a butting-in game and not a conversation.’

Weddings are objectionable because, ‘they are forced jollity and an ostentatious display of money’. They are, he says, ‘a complete waste of a day and you’re usually there to make up the numbers and make people feel popular.’

He doesn’t like restaurants because ‘If you go out to a restaurant you’re bombarded with canned music and blather and noise and you can’t hear people properly,’ and, he adds, ‘I don’t like drunks and I don’t like shouting at people in loud bars.’

He was apparently like this as a child, always preferring books to people. What’s surprising is that most people think he’s shy but he’s actually very self-assured. As he says, he just doesn’t enjoy socializing and he prefers the thoughts in his head to those of other people, and always has.

When I complain that sometimes you just have to put up with things for the sake of friendship he counters with, ‘OK, then, well make them all come out on a 20-mile walk.’ How can I argue?

Work parties are a no-no, of course. Every year he is invited, every year he declines. I have never met his colleagues, apart from in town by accident or when I have collected him from work.

Last year his work had their annual Christmas lunch and he waited until it was over until going down to eat because ‘the crackers and extra plates got in the way of my newspaper.’

His argument against going to the work Christmas party is that it would spoil his working relationships. While most of us gladly grab the opportunity to get sozzled and make inappropriate suggestions to our colleagues, my partner finds the whole idea tiresome.

‘What I really value is a decent professional relationship with people,’ he explains. ‘In order to preserve a good professional relationship, I want to keep the personal relationship on the lowest possible burner.’

Compromise? ‘I began going on my own, hooking up with single friends or taking along a platonic ‘date’ instead’

He gets on well with his colleagues and he is well liked but to explain his unwillingness to socialize with them outside of work he produces the following laborious explanation.

‘I see them for 40 hours a week. I have around 80 hours a week when I am not sleeping. Forty hours of that are spent at work, ten hours are spent traveling to work. With the remaining hours, why on earth would I want to extend my working week?’

What do his friends think of this? Well, I think you can guess what I’ll say to that. While I make friends left, right and center, my partner’s unsociability does make the idea of having friends difficult.

There are a chosen few (mainly my friends and their partners) who have doggedly hung on and who are now tolerated at the homestead dinner table without struggle but they know better than to issue an invitation to a party or expect us to attend a dinner party together.

We met up for a rare coffee with a good male friend of mine some months ago and while there Bob passed on some books that he thought my friend would like. A week or so later my friend broke the cardinal rule and texted him to say how much he was enjoying one of them.

You’d have thought he’d asked to borrow £1,000. ‘Why did he need to text me?’ came the response, ‘why can’t he just read the books?’ adding, ‘I just don’t understand why he would want to waste his and my time sending me a text saying something we both already know.’

But- you know - I have spent 12 years trying to change him, trying to make him into a party animal (or at the very least a party-goer) and finally I think I might have given up.

When I rock in at 2am, party-hat on sideways, the worse for wear on pink fizz and he’s there, book in hand, with a cup of milky coffee and a kind word, I know things could be worse, far worse.

Source: dailymail.co.uk

2 Comments

New psychology class could offer relationship advice

News

by Courtney Kerrigan

Course defines the ‘hook-up,’ other new relationship terms

“It’s complicated” - that’s the typical and oh-so-familiar phrase that many couples use to describe their relationships, or lack thereof.

But while both men and women search for a solution to the confusing terminology, the psychology department is offering a class in the spring that may provide some answers.

Sex and Romance in the 21st Century centers on the study of different relationships that occur today, said Manfred Van Dulmen, assistant professor and creator of the class.

The class is offered Tuesdays and Thursdays from 10 to 11:15 a.m. in Bowman Hall and is worth three credit hours.

It not only focuses on marital and dating relationships, but also other experiences such as “hooking up” or “friends with benefits.”

“A number of courses at other universities teach around personal relationships and focus more on marital relationships,” Van Dulmen said. “What I wanted to do was have a course that expands beyond that and reflects the sort of broad array of experiences in relationships that people may have right now.”

Van Dulmen said he will discuss psychological theories and ideas that help students understand why people enter into certain relationships, both positive and negative.

“I think it will help students understand relationships that they may have or other people around them may have,” he said.

The class is open to anyone, as it’s not limited to psychology majors or upperclassmen.

He added that students interested in being psychologists or therapists in the future will benefit significantly from the class, as the coursework will help in dealing with relationships.

Students will also look at romantic experiences that may be linked to future romantic relationships, and how these experiences are rooted in past relationships with parents and friends.

“Until maybe 10 years ago, most people thought that adolescent romantic relationships were short lived - that people really saw it as something that happened in movies or novels, but not that it was a real thing with real implications,” Van Dulmen said.

The class stands as a lecture class, but Van Dulmen said there will be some guest speakers, video material from TV and movies and possible discussion with students, although the size of the class may reach 400 students.

“This is a topic I’m very excited about because I study this area,” Van Dulmen said. “I haven’t taught a course like this, and it’s one of the reasons I wanted to do this.”

Although Van Dulmen admits he has not taught undergraduate students in a few years, he has instructed graduate statistics courses in his six years at Kent State.

“We hope that this will be a course that will get some people excited about psychology or studying relationships.”

Source: kentnewsnet.com

3 Comments

Empowering Women through “Empowering Hearts”

"Safer in the City" by Jessica Walker

by: Jessica Walker

I had a wonderful opportunity on November 12th to participate in the first annual “Empowering Hearts” event dedicated to raising awareness of domestic violence and abuse.  This event was extremely informative and opened my eyes to the amount of women exposed to this type of violence.  In fact, I was very surprised to learn that one in four women will be a victim of abuse during her lifetime, according to The Mary Kay Foundation.

The “Empowering Hearts” team comprised of SaferDates.com, Victoria Peasley, Mary Kay Independent Senior Sales Director, and Transitions. The event featured a domestic violence victim with an inspiring story of how she broke free from her abuser.  Victoria Peasley spoke on behalf of The Mary Kay Foundation and covered the resources and programs available to woman through their website.  Among those resources is a guide specifically for single woman called Healthy Relationships: A Guide to Dating Violence. I was so impressed with the level of dedication that Mary Kay puts forth annually to create awareness and with the amount of women’s shelters that benefit from their grants.  In 2009, The Mary Kay Foundation awarded $3 million in total grants to 150 domestic violence shelters in all 50 states.

Following Victoria’s presentation, Transitions offered tips on how healthy eating can benefit your mind and body. Safer Dates with yours truly joining Rick DeAguila, our self defense expert, proceeded to demonstrate how everyday items like a water bottle and a rolled up magazine can help keep you safe. Be on the lookout for a video coming soon that will demonstrate these very techniques. Concluding the presentations was Barb Kyes, with Action Coach Pinellas, who told an empowering story about how she broke free from her abuser.

Now The Mary Kay Foundation will continue to collect donations on behalf of this event through the end of the year.  If you are interested in donating to help women in need, please submit your contribution through the Mary Kay Foundation link and make sure to reference the “Empowering Hearts” Event.

I would like to thank all of our sponsors and all those who attended our first annual “Empowering Hearts” event.  Relationships grow and strengthen when we join together to give back to our community.

Until next time, here’s to keeping you Safer in the City!

- Jessica

No Comments
« Older Posts